They told me a long time ago, they didn’t like me and I would never get it. That’s at least forty years ago. Maybe it’s less. Thirty-five years. They said, “You will never get the Nobel Prize, because we don’t like you,” and they sent a special official to tell me so.
DORIS LESSING
October 1919
November 2013
It’s been going on now for thirty years. I have won all the prizes in Europe, every bloody one. It’s a Royal Flush. Am I supposed to be elated, or excited, or what? I have won all the prizes in Europe. Every one. So, I’ve won them all. So, okay, the Nobel… I say it’s a Royal Flush. But I’m going to have to think of nice things to say…
I mean the whole thing is so graceless and stupid and bad-mannered. Bad-mannered. That’s what they are. I’m very glad I won the Nobel Prize and I’m already thinking of all the people who are going to send me begging letters. I see them lining up now. And what am I going to do? I want to start another book. And I’m going to be too busy giving interviews to all your lot…
#DorisLessing #LIterature
http://www.nytimes.com/video/books/100000002556650/doris-lessing-on-the-nobel-prize.html
November 18, 2013 at 1:53 am
You know what? I think I love her. She did indeed have the last laugh.
November 18, 2013 at 2:03 am
I miss her already.
November 18, 2013 at 2:10 am
Oh to speak with such honesty and clarity Dee Solberg and John Jainschigg. She was true to herself, no matter the fickle Nobel Committee. Reminds me of Salinger’s relationship with The New Yorker…they rejected and rejected and rejected him…
November 18, 2013 at 2:17 am
She knew she was worthy with or without, had the confidence within herself to call them on bad behavior when they grudgingly allowed a win so many years later. I say grudging, because one who makes a point to come to your door to tell you, “you’ll never win. We don’t like you,” and takes 35+ years to come right is grudging.
November 18, 2013 at 2:37 am
What I admire Dee Solberg is that the fire within her was stronger than the grudge. The story with Alice Munro is different. It’s more that the art of the short story wasn’t at the top of the literary list. It mattered not to her. She did her thing. Would that all young women were able to more readily turn their backs on critcism and be true to themselves, eh? Doris Lessing and Isak Dinesen were, I think, the two female writers whose spirits had the biggest impact on me growing up. Something about willpower. And talent.
November 18, 2013 at 3:18 am
I wish too Giselle Minoli which is why I say I love her, not just for going on to do her thing, win everything including what they told her she couldn’t, and then making sure everyone knew she’d never held her breath for them.
November 18, 2013 at 6:41 am
I just can’t overlook the abandoning her children, it colours everything for me.
November 18, 2013 at 8:42 am
I understand that Daniela Huguet Taylor, and yet I empathize with Doris Lessing at the same time. So much has been written about the dilemma artists have to wrestle with – love, marriage and family, or focus on a personal artistic goal whether it be writing or the fine arts, or, even, a more traditional professional goal such as being a doctor. I think we look very harshly on women like Lessing, and yet, for instance, Picasso wasn’t such a great father or marriage partner. And in so many ways, there are so very many children whose fathers’ professions were so time consuming it was as though they had no fathers to begin with. But I think we are particularly critical of women and have an almost intractable view of what it means to be a good mother.
If you asked me which I would rather have had – a Doris Lessing who didn’t abandon her two children, or a Doris Lessing who inspired generations of women (writers or otherwise) to follow their dreams, if my answer were that I am glad for her literary contribution and influence, does that mean I advocate creative women abandoning their children? No, I don’t think so. I simply think it illustrates a horrible choice that has to get made every day.
Perhaps she wasn’t meant to be a mother? Perhaps this is not something she knew prior? Should she have been forced not to abandon them? Would that have been “better?” I don’t know. I empathize with her, particularly if you think about the social timeframe oh so long ago when she had them. It would be easy to say, ‘Well, she shouldn’t have had them,’ but social constraints have tremendous influence on women… I don’t have an answer for you, but I’m glad for her contribution, because that means something beyond her own life.
November 18, 2013 at 9:02 am
I know, and it’s true, and yet reading the article, it seems that she was generally a faithless sort of person. I highly respect women who decide not to have children, even if that doesn’t resonate with me, but having had them (not one, but two! What was she thinking of! And then later a third! What happened to him? Not much is said about Peter…), to then abandon them is something that speaks deeply to me, of selfishness. And I can’t abide with selfishness to that degree, so that I wonder at the message that she gives, the value of it, and if she really merits being an inspiration or not.
And I wouldn’t force her not to abandon them, mind, each person being free to do as they will (up to a certain point of course), but I certainly do not hold these people up as models of humanity. Not because they are your children, but because they are weaker souls that need love and care until they can manage by themselves. You do not leave the sick, the elderly, or the young, to fend for themselves and “save yourself first”. Not in my dogma at least.
November 18, 2013 at 9:06 am
PS: let me just add that I do admire those women who give up their children for adoption at birth, or under otherwise unlivable circumstances, that’s quite a different thing.
November 18, 2013 at 12:50 pm
Daniela Huguet Taylor I can’t quibble with the sensitive issues you raise. Clearly she was in turmoil about the issue and it is that with which I empathize. I also don’t want to go down the road that would suggest that a person’s artistic merit or value is altogether tied to some sort of harmony and unity within their souls and selves. Otherwise we would have to utterly dismiss Picasso (never described as a “good” man) and, from all accounts, J.D. Salinger as well, who was also in tremendous turmoil about family and children and was estranged from a daughter who was interviewed for the recent documentary about Salinger’s life.
And in an entirely unrelated field, we’d have to eradicate Steve Jobs, notoriously an unkind man. I have not heard he was unkind to his children, but to his employees. Does that make him a better, or a worse, man?
I raise the issue because I don’t believe that because Lessing was a failure with her children that there isn’t a worthy literary legacy there. It is easier today for a women to decide not to have children, then it was oh so long ago.
Women judge one another severely about this issue. I know that from personal experience…because I chose not to have them.
November 18, 2013 at 1:14 pm
I must admit, I have a tendency to colour my feelings for the work of someone based on their whole character, so if I read about Picasso being a nasty man, it does make me appreciate his art less. A recent issue (for me) has been Orson Scott Card, whom I didn’t know was so against gays, but knowing now, it takes out some of the enjoyment I have in his Ender’s saga (huge shame!).
Nevertheless, I was commenting more on the whole “I so admire her/him” sort of declarations, the upholding of a person as a beacon, when their life doesn’t really echo this.
Being very strict on the issue, I must say regarding the choice to be childless: sex isn’t obligatory. I mean to say, in these discussions it often seems as if there were no way around it, but one could (unless rape or arranged marriage, of course) remain celibate, at least as far as “normal” (pregnancy-inducing) intercourse is concerned. Reading that article, it doesn’t seem like she was careful at all, in fact she toyed with aborting but didn’t… so at least for her, I don’t feel sorry or understanding of her situation because I do think there were other, less horrible, options open to her which she didn’t choose to take.
November 18, 2013 at 1:30 pm
I am forgiving of women who struggle with this particular issue because I know many of them and have throughout my life. It is easy for a woman to grapple with this if the circumstances of her life were set up for her to handle it otherwise – counsel, support, instruction, a sense of security, etc. But I have known too many women who were, Yes, because of their families and religions and social cultures, tormented by it. That she toyed with abortion and didn’t is a perfect example – I can almost see the wheels turning.
I have often been accused of being selfish for choosing not to have children. Having them is the world-wide automatic default. Sticking with it no matter what is the automatic default expectation. Disavowing oneself of any inner turmoil in order to be a good mother, is the automatic default challenge.
I can’t so easily as you declare that she could have done it differently, because it seems clear that she couldn’t…and didn’t. The book about Lessing’s life is unfinished. But perhaps one of the Lessons of Lessing is that (once again) the juggling of marriage and family with a creative and artistic calling is almost damning for women, which is the reason so few succeed.
Where would I draw the line and withhold my admiration for someone? If I discovered they were anti-semitic, certainly, or, Yes, anti-gay/lesbian. But I think that falls into a different category than an artist’s struggle with their own family/creative calling.
November 18, 2013 at 1:39 pm
P.S. Daniela Huguet Taylor the one big question I have is with regard to emotional health in this case…
November 18, 2013 at 1:47 pm
I know many people do, wrongly in my opinion, expect one to have children, or set this apart from everything else, but I judge this as I would any other duty (this one self-imposed in most cases, despite peer/culture pressure, unlike others) such as caring for your elderly parents or siblings or a hurt stranger by your side in an accident. And how you treat your family, or gays, shouldn’t be any different, either.
In this case, she didn’t abandon her children in order to write, anyway, did she? It was family life itself that she couldn’t stand.
November 18, 2013 at 1:49 pm
PS: I am not so forgiving because I think that another wrong decision (abandoning) doesn’t fix the first one (to have children).
November 18, 2013 at 1:58 pm
I’m not suggesting it does Daniela Huguet Taylor. I’m suggesting that whether she is deserving of the Nobel and/or respect or admiration for her work as a writer may not have anything to do with her failure as a mother. You are of course entitled to judge her however is appropriate for you.
For me, were I to post about artists based on whether I thought they were pristine people or not, well, I dare say I would have to switch to posting about technology…
November 18, 2013 at 2:09 pm
Hehehehehe
November 18, 2013 at 2:42 pm
A couple of examples of less than pristine famous men artists, whose contributions to their art are, I think, unquestioned:
Elia Kazan, whose testimony in front of the House Committee on UnAmerican Activities set him against his Hollywood colleagues. He is the Director of A Streetcar Named Desire, On the Waterfront and Splendor in the Grass, to name just a few. He was dissed at the Oscars when he was given a lifetime achievement award, interestingly not by fellow directors, but by actors. He is one of the great Hollywood directors, whose contribution to film is immeasurable. What took hold of him during McCarthyism? I don’t know.
Robert Redford, philandering husband, not so warm and fuzzy a father, is the Godfather of independent film in the US. The Sundance Institute has funded, shaped, supported and brought to life untold numbers of scripts that would have had no life elsewhere. Again, his contribution to the independent film movement is immeasurable.
I just don’t think we can judge a person’s creative or intellectual output by their failures as mothers, fathers, or, even as children…because they are not all little gems either!
November 18, 2013 at 2:46 pm
That’s not true, I’m sure you would set the limit at, for example, a former Nazi camp commander, or the guy who shot a classroom full of kids? After that, it’s a question of setting your own personal limit.
November 18, 2013 at 3:04 pm
I’m not aware of admiring the “artistic” work of someone who has committed such crimes Daniela Huguet Taylor…but I’ll keep a look out. But…the films of Leni Riefenstahl come to mind???? I didn’t like her work so I’m off the hook!
November 18, 2013 at 3:10 pm
🙂
November 18, 2013 at 7:50 pm
I have an interesting story that might be related. I met with my college counselor on my second or third day after classes started. I had selected this counselor because I was planning to apply to a special program in three years to transfer to a very rigorous program at a very prominent institution. I wanted to make sure that I knew all the requirements, get all the classes I needed, and make a good impact on the three professors who determined which candidates were accepted (my counselor was one of them).
He told me after about 5 minutes of talking to me that “I wasn’t a good fit for the program” and probably wouldn’t make it.
Screw them.
November 18, 2013 at 9:23 pm
T. Pascal you raise a good point. It’s easy to judge Doris Lessing based on her own behavior…but it isn’t even remotely possible to see what kind of treatment she was subjected to by those who didn’t understand her, or didn’t want to understand her, because she didn’t fit in, because she wasn’t like other “women,” because she wasn’t behaving “properly”…or whatever.
Salinger was told, essentially, the same thing by The New Yorker.
Too bad for the institution who missed out on the sweetness of you T. Pascal.
November 18, 2013 at 9:50 pm
I still remember falling in love with the Golden Notebook 😉
November 18, 2013 at 10:02 pm
I take the Groucho Marx attitude: if they want me to be a member, I say no. If they don’t want me to be a member, great!
November 18, 2013 at 10:16 pm
T. Pascal dare I note that the Grouch and Ms. Lessing had more talent in their little toes than all of their critics in their entire beings combined? It seems to go that way. It’s so easy to pick apart. People are complicated. People are fallible. People are…human…
November 18, 2013 at 11:14 pm
Giselle Minoli Considering they gave one to Arafat and Obama, isn’t it just a meaningless platitude? I’d decline.
November 18, 2013 at 11:28 pm
Hi, R. Harlan Smith…she sort of did decline by virtue of her tart remarks. Still…there is something about getting it, which even she recognized. Perhaps it’s as close to an apology from “The Committee” as they are capable of getting. Committees are made up of people. People get things right and they get things wrong. They are wise. They are unwise. They are judgemental. They are all sorts of things. I personally don’t know any artistic sort of person who wouldn’t, no matter their public protestations, be grateful for the recognition of such an award…
November 18, 2013 at 11:39 pm
Giselle Minoli You know me.
What recognition? There’s no recognition if they’ll award it to a terrorist like Arafat or a moron like Obama who did absolutely nothing to deserve it. The psuedo-prestige of receiving the Nobel prize is a myth. It’s a vanity award with no more significance than a varsity jacket.
November 18, 2013 at 11:49 pm
That is true for you, R. Harlan Smith I grant that. But it clearly wasn’t true for Doris Lessing… Each to their own?