Five Talented Dancers + an Empty Warehouse + the Countryside + a Video Camera x the Human Condition = Gravity of Center, a choreographed site specific conversation between 3 men and 2 women. It’s impossible to explore this kind of movement in a traditional studio or theatre space. Remove dance from a constrained space, no matter how well-designed the set, and “stage” it in nontraditional indoor and outdoor spaces and the movement conversation changes, expands and challenges the viewer.
When I started dancing at 6, the only styles really discussed with any seriousness were Ballet and Modern, and Modern took a distant (very distant) second place. Sure, there was a smattering of talk about the rich tradition of Flamenco and certain other exotic dance forms from distant countries, but it took a while before an acknowledged homage was paid to the thrilling choreography born on Broadway. West Side Story was the magical blending of drama, dance and music, all put together to explore…ah, Yes…the human condition – love/hate, male/female, us/them, the individual and the pack.
As with any art form, we had to learn steps, notes…structure…before venturing out into the territory of disciplined self-expression. Sometimes our teacher would let us just move, however which way we wanted. But it was always in a studio, a huge university gymnasium in fact, a space that always felt constraining, as though there was a predetermined way one had to move in such a traditional space on a hardwood floor. And we were very much affected by what we saw being performed around us. Modern, to me, was as experimental as it got, but still it didn’t quite break away from the accepted notions and ideas of dance the way Jazz had broken away to become its own thing in music decades before.
There was a kind of accepted movement that had taken root in my head that I couldn’t cut myself free from, which had everything to do with what we had been taught was “beautiful” or “graceful.” But when I closed my eyes, movement was never constrained. It was wild and free and weird sometimes, and it didn’t necessarily make sense and it didn’t necessarily follow the “rules” of traditional dance notation. But I was neither skilled nor confident enough to explore it, and so for a very long time the internal dance freedom I would feel when I closed my eyes remained in my head, to be explored and imagined privately.
Now dance choreography is anything but constrained. And a camera can follow it anywhere. And the conversation between dancers can be seen everywhere. It used to be very expensive to see a dance concert. I would beg my mother to take me and I had to settle for photographs of dancers in magazines. I was starved for a kind of dance that didn’t take place in a studio.
Now I can sit on a Saturday morning and discover fabulous expressions of conversation in movement on the internet. Like Gravity of Center, which popped up on Vimeo.
Okay, so it takes more than a few minutes to watch it. But it’s worth it. Whether you like dance or not, watch it anyway…because it’s really about something else entirely.
There is a “price” we each have to pay for freedom…but it is the place we must all go…with ourselves and one another….
Cheers,
Giselle
#dancergy #dance
May 4, 2013 at 3:07 pm
Nice! I love when dancers get their due! 😉
May 4, 2013 at 3:09 pm
Hi Phill Hocking. I think you would like and get this piece…it’s kind of wild.
May 4, 2013 at 3:31 pm
Just putting this on watch later so I can really enjoy it. Thanks as always Giselle Minoli – you always post inspiring content.
May 4, 2013 at 3:40 pm
You’ll want to watch this, Rhonda LeCuyer.
May 4, 2013 at 3:41 pm
Good morning Ellie Kennard. If you get a chance to watch it, Ellie, I would be curious to know what you as a photographer think (feel?) about it…
May 4, 2013 at 3:53 pm
Morning Leland LeCuyer and Rhonda LeCuyer. I always took dance class on Saturday morning and will forever associate that day and time of the week with “the body….”
May 4, 2013 at 4:06 pm
Very fun to watch. Thanks for sharing!
May 4, 2013 at 4:16 pm
I will happily post my feelings about it Giselle Minoli
May 4, 2013 at 8:06 pm
Well, it is the question Sheri ONeill at least for me it was when I first watched it and that same question filters through every time I’ve watched it sense.
I suppose it’s impossible not to project on it. We see what resonates perhaps…and what I sense is that the group was holding onto her. She wasn’t violently struggling to get away…but rather gently but insistently asking to be free.
The word “freedom” is so loaded for most people I think. Can we be “free” within a group? Of course. But it isn’t easy. Groups often cling and demand a certain behavior and it takes sophistication and wisdom to allow freedom within the constraints of a group.
Even dancers deal with this – my space/your space, me the individual dancer/we, the group of dancers.
How do we grow in the company of others? They with us and we with them? Is it about giving one another permission to be themselves, not always understood, not always making sense, not always fitting in?
Yes…for me at least. I think the hardest thing is to say “I choose you. I want to be here. But I do not need to be here.” That I think is freedom
What is your take, Sheri ONeill? Most curious…
May 4, 2013 at 9:02 pm
Hi Paula Jones…you are welcome….
May 5, 2013 at 7:20 am
These are not dancers. They are walkers, or, skippers, or something. I mean, really, “wrestless wondering” could be more poignant. West Side Story boasts much more skill; and its no wonder Ballet was too arduous for you.
May 5, 2013 at 1:41 pm
Unsure where your assumption came from that ballet was too arduous for me – what I wrote is that I did not have the skill or confidence to dance with the freedom of expression of the dancers in this video, nor where your judgment that these young women and men are not dancers but rather skippers comes from. If you had any dance training you would clearly see the depth of their training, some of it obviously in ballet, much of it in modern and Jazz and definitely street and break to name only a few of the styles that are evident in the body movements. It is simply not possible for anyone without serious dance training to move with the control these dancers move. If your observation is that you don’t like the choreography, which is how the the expression of the “story” (which perhaps doesn’t move you either) is defined then I would simply say it is not your taste in movement. That is fine. But to degrade it is perhaps because you are not willing to look at it rigorously? Too arduous Rebecca Hinckley?
May 5, 2013 at 2:13 pm
For what it’s worth to anyone who is interested in the background about the dancers in this film, the person behind the group is Victor Quijada, whose style here is decidedly post-modern but who is making a name for himself internationally with Ballet and Modern companies as well. He clearly is exploring dance movement free of constraints while incorporating elements of and knowledge about “street” dancing as well as more traditional styles of dancing.
His troupe is called Groupe Rubberband Dance. The link to the website is: http://rubberbandance.com/about/victor-quijada/. The training of his dancers ranges from Ballet to Modern to Hip-Hop to Martial Arts to Fusion to skilled Improvisation.
May 5, 2013 at 5:28 pm
It is daring Lance Hagood. I think we are all dancers in one way or another…even those who don’t dance. It is emotion expressed in movement and I’m grateful for this post modern expression of it and for dancers like these. It broadens the audience. I thought the cinematography was fabulous.
Thank ALL of you who have watched and shared it. I appreciate it. I know it took an investment of time…
May 6, 2013 at 12:41 pm
Good morning Giselle Minoli. Yesterday morning, I finally watched this silent film. Movies without words portray stories and ideas in a unique way differently than “talkies.” The audience experiences their own emotions as opposed to them being guided by a carefully constructed script.
Gravity of Center feels like an abstract painting to me. The expression can be interpreted many ways. Isn’t that what we humans do though? We each interpret facts, novels, movies, music, whatever we experience differently. Three eyewitnesses to an event each give a different accounting. (I forget the name of that law or axiom). This is what I love about dance.
One of our student’s parents is the co-director of a local theater company. We recently discussed why dance is the orphan of the arts. Her opinion is, “Lack of spoken word.” Dance takes a little more work and a little more imagination. But I digress.
To your points In your mind, you could move anyway you like and breaking away from the group, yesterday we had in studio recitals for our 5-6 year old students. They closed with improv, or what they call “free dance.” The music was allegro pop. Most of the dancers grouped together. One dancer went off on her own in a beautiful adagio. She danced on the count. It was pure expression. She phrased with allegro crescendos. She knew exactly what she was doing; deliberately and gracefully. Gravity of Center?
May 6, 2013 at 1:00 pm
Good morning to you, Gary S. Hart! I think about little girls and boys often when it comes to creativity…playing, dancing, making art. The progression always seems to be: just express yourself, now study the formalities so that you can fully express yourself, now unlearn the formalities so that you are in control of them and they are not in control of you, and, finally…just express yourself!
I felt the same way when I watched this. It is absolutely a painting…on film…of dance…and silent conversation. The lack of the the spoken word. Yes! that is why I stopped dancing. Had there been this medium back then I’m not sure I would have.
I just read an article about Baz Luhrmann and Catherine Martin (his wife who is also his production and costume designer) about his conception of The Great Gatsby, which I’m looking forward to seeing.
For each artist to find the way that is the authentic expression of their art is the thing. For Agnes de Mille it was one way, for Martha G, another, for Pina B and Sankai Juku yet another. What I respect is the harmonious blending of mediums that Victor Quijada employs, as does Baz Luhrmann in his films. Laurie Anderson did it decades ago with music.
It’s thrilling when we look at something and ask: Is it dance? Is it a film? Is it a painting? What, exactly is it? It’s the Gravity of Center…
Thank you for taking the time to watching it Gary S. Hart and for commenting. I appreciate it.
May 6, 2013 at 1:29 pm
Giselle Minoli, you perfectly defined the role of an instructor, professor, teacher, mentor and coach. To impart the skills needed to fully express oneself without making one a slave to technique. We had a similar discussion on another thread.
May 6, 2013 at 1:51 pm
BTY G. We = you and I 🙂 Hope you’re well and having fun!
May 6, 2013 at 6:26 pm
Just took an ahhhh break and watched this;quite lovely and thanks for sharing Giselle Minoli and HELLO Gary S. Hart !
May 7, 2013 at 10:48 am
Well, if you were to take a break with anything other than a health smoothie or something Kim Crawford M.D. – Anti-Aging Doctor Florida I’m glad it was this dance film!
May 7, 2013 at 2:41 pm
Yes,was lovely and hey,miss you!
May 18, 2013 at 2:28 pm
la marche silencieuse !
May 18, 2013 at 2:30 pm
a la recherche de l’enigme cachee !
May 18, 2013 at 2:34 pm
la redécouverte !*
May 18, 2013 at 2:41 pm
jean-luc Sanson 😉
May 17, 2015 at 2:50 pm
.
جط