Good April Fool’s Day, all. ‘Twas supposed to have been sunny, but ’tis rainin’ here.
“We numb vulnerability. One of the things we need to think about is how and why we numb. We make everything that is uncertain, certain. Religion has gone from a belief in faith and mystery to certainty. “I’m right, you’re wrong. Shut up.” That’s it. The more afraid we are, the more vulnerable we are, and the more afraid we become. We perfect. But it doesn’t work, because what we do is take fat from our butts and put it in our cheeks. I hope a hundred years from now people will look back and go….”Wow!” We pretend that what we do doesn’t have an effect on people. We need to let ourselves be seen, deeply seen. Vulnerably seen. To love with our whole hearts, even though there is no guarantee. To practice love with gratitude and joy. To believe that we are enough…then we stop screaming and start listening, and we’re kindler and gentler to the people around us, and we’re kinder and gentler to ourselves. That’s all I have.” – Brené Brown, TEDTalk, The Power of Vulnerability
Although it might not seem so from reading the above, Brené Brown’s talk on vulnerability is hilarious. Speaking personally, every “vulnerability alarm” in my body has been pushed these past three years – you know, those classical stress inducers of moving, job changes, death…things like that. It’s easy when this happens to station sentries along the walls surrounding our lives, call out our psychological dogs, circle the wagons and arm ourselves with arrows, daggers or grenades, or whichever particular armament suits you in times of danger.
The problem is that while self-protection is necessary to a degree, it can also stand between us and joy, happiness, fulfillment and deep connection to ourselves and others, which is what we all crave. Brené Brown has spent her entire career investigating the human need for connection. I agree with her claim that this is what we are here for, this is what we are about, this is what we need, this is what makes our lives worthwhile.
Almost 4,000,000 have watched this particular TEDTalk, so she has clearly struck a nerve. She struck mine, and if you’re in the mood for a few good laughs, watch this intriguing, gentle, warm…and vulnerable…talk on heading for the beer banana nut muffins in order to avoid being vulnerable, and taking fat out of our bums and putting it in our cheeks in order to be perfect!
Hope it’s not raining where you are, but if it is, enjoy your day.
Giselle
April 1, 2012 at 2:11 pm
I watched this video a week ago or so. I haven’t perceived my daily routines and actions the same since.
April 1, 2012 at 2:15 pm
Sending sunshine from FL your way!!! Happy April Fool’s day. 🙂
April 1, 2012 at 3:02 pm
That was real nice, thanks for sharing it.
April 1, 2012 at 3:07 pm
Incredible talk Giselle. We might revise Friedrich Nietzsche’s “That which does not kill us makes us stronger” to That which we do not fear makes us stronger.
April 1, 2012 at 3:24 pm
So wise and funny. Thanks for the post.
April 1, 2012 at 5:49 pm
Giselle Minoli I love Brene Brown’s attitude and her ability to be self-deprecating as well as serious. She was the inspiration behind a post I wrote on authenticity last year, just as G+ was taking off (it’s here if you’re interested http://goo.gl/Sqm28) – we need more people like her.
April 1, 2012 at 6:51 pm
Gary S Hart did you read Christopher Hitchens last article for Vanity Fair, in which he lays waste to Neitzsche’s That which does not kills us makes us stronger? Brilliantly written, as was most everything he wrote. I would side with you however and say: That which we fear and don’t confront, surely has the potential to destroy our dreams. More fuel for the be vulnerable theory.
April 1, 2012 at 6:56 pm
David Amerland I love your article on authenticity. Time to float it out there into the Googlesphere again. Do you mind if I do that?
April 1, 2012 at 6:59 pm
Giselle Minoli Not at all. I am really glad you like it. I believe social media with its unflinching demand for transparency is helping create more and more authentic voices and this is great for everyone, from writers to content providers and businesses.
April 1, 2012 at 7:04 pm
I share your interest in authenticity and transparency. It is one of the reasons that I post publicly David Amerland. I believe strongly that it keeps in alignment, intention, purpose and outcome. If we think about what we are doing here every day, what we want to accomplish and contribute, how we express ourselves and where we want it to take us, it’s a better community. If we’re just letting it hang out all the time without any thought, it isn’t any different than paint splattered on a canvas. Jackson Pollock thought about what he was doing. It wasn’t an accident. I will post it again later tonight. Thank you for sharing it with me. I think it’s timely…again!
April 1, 2012 at 7:09 pm
Giselle Minoli Love your thinking. Proof of Jack C Crawford’s ability to act as a catalyst for meaningful connections.
April 1, 2012 at 7:10 pm
Jack C Crawford is one who thinks about everything I suspect…and if he doesn’t he’s sure got me fooled!
April 1, 2012 at 7:13 pm
It is all inspiration. My thinking cap got sold at a rummage sale.
April 1, 2012 at 7:13 pm
Hence, my penchant for free association
April 1, 2012 at 7:15 pm
Jack C Crawford Inspired! As always. 🙂
April 1, 2012 at 7:16 pm
{evil laughter}
April 1, 2012 at 7:19 pm
Good afternoon everyone. I remember Hitchen’s last article, your post and another interesting, exploratory conversation led by you. We had an evocative conversation about that which doesn’t kill you… The question I’ve been asking myself is where should we draw the boundaries of confidence and self-deprecation? Like Brené, I like strategies and compartments, although the squishy stuff is fascinating to me.
Very nice post David Amerland, and we need more. More reminders about being people. Last year I wrote “McSelling & McMarketing” slamming thoughtless automated marketing and in the words of the great Jack C Crawford, “coin operated selling.” Another post was title “Do You Really Give a Sh*t About Your Customers?” Speaking of the angel himself; hey Jack.
April 1, 2012 at 7:23 pm
Gary S Hart I of very small brain cannot remember everything. I would so love it if Google+ would help me with this so that I could drag meaningful posts into a special folder to be summoned up when I need it the most, which is always….
April 1, 2012 at 7:33 pm
Gary S Hart Thank you and wow! This is such an interesting question you pose and itself raises many more, like why would we be less or more confident being ourselves? I would suggest we act the same way we would if we met in your living room with your mum present. A slow opening up of who we are. Speaking and listening in equal measure. A willingness to consider that our point of view may not be as entirely right as we may think it is. These are all elements which are remixed each time in each situation (and there is still a strong possibility we will somehow get it wrong). Social media is new in its present format. We are still learning its tropes and this is what makes it exciting. Questioning it, the way you did, is what makes it real and helps everyone of us take one more step towards the right direction.
April 1, 2012 at 7:34 pm
Did you mean me or Gary Stockton Giselle? Have you gone through your about page and scrolled through your posts?
April 1, 2012 at 7:52 pm
Regarding the talk, I used to seek certainty. While I haven’t given up on the pragmatism of common sense, my journey is now mysterious. By choice, I seek uncertainty. As it turns out, it is tremendously easy to seek. All is already uncertain, so I have decided not to think about what the certain thing might conceivably be.
That’s part of the “thought” behind my rummage sale reference above. At some point, my loved ones may suffer unduly from my loss of cognition. I feel badly about that. One of my grandmothers became senile before her passing. She had the grumpy and rude type of Alzheimer’s. I loved her.
So, my point is that thought serves us all best when it has an inspired vision; when it produces a benefit for others in our World. As Giselle tells us so very well, putting creative, considered and meaningful thoughts into written form serves the highest calling.
April 1, 2012 at 7:54 pm
Jack C Crawford Deep and insightful. It actually makes sense (even at a cognitive level). 🙂
April 1, 2012 at 7:59 pm
Thank u David. How’s life today in the UK?
April 1, 2012 at 8:01 pm
Jack C Crawford A petrol strike underway and politicians who seriously think that democracy would best be served if all email and text messages were subject to scrutiny. Apart from that everything is plain sailing.
April 1, 2012 at 8:06 pm
Oh my…apologies…I told you I had a very small brain…YOU Gary S Hart! Changing it above!
April 1, 2012 at 8:10 pm
Democracy … When the masses get exactly what they want from the minority
April 1, 2012 at 10:01 pm
I enjoyed David’s blog post too. I find that my professional life and personal life flourish when I can be as authentic as possible.
In my job I do have to speak with the voice of the brand often, and the social media side of things allows me to bring a little bit of myself to the role from time.
I’d say vulnerability for me is a precious commodity I hope to never run out of. It’s an important condition required to write and sing songs, something i like to do in my spare time.
April 2, 2012 at 12:08 am
Gary S Hart you make a good point about striking a balance between vulnerability and confidence. Brene B came to her insights about vulnerability via analysis: said she likes to “hack into” things; her research no doubt continued to measure things. Similarly with the recent topic of artists/scientists using empathy – yes, but in combination with strategy, analysis – a more detached orientation.
April 2, 2012 at 1:09 am
Gary Stockton Thank you so much for chiming in and apologies everyone for disappearing for a few hours. It’s my husband’s birthday (tomorrow) and I took him to dinner tonight and shut off the computer…in favor of face-to-face time with someone I love.
I am really interested in Jack C Crawford’s comments about certainty/uncertainty. I am convinced that one of the benefits of getting older is that we leave behind all of the ruthlessly programmed social constraints, which serve to keep us in line culturally, but which can very often keep us very far away fro our “authentic” selves. Perhaps things like Alzheimer’s strip us of these constraints and the reason that we are so uncomfortable is that there is a rawness, an authenticity, a guilelessness about that behavior that we can all identify within our selves but which we repress, suppress and hide.
I don’t think anyone can create anything of value when they are “constrained,” only when they are authentic. We criticize Steve Jobs for being absolutely without mannered constraint, but what if that is the exact reason he was able to create? Why is it that so many creative people seem to suffer from psychological “problems?”
Why is it that Brene Brown and everyone else I know of are “afraid” of vulnerability? It is an emotional state that takes us straight into the unknown, without safety nets, without certainty, without any guarantee.
April 2, 2012 at 1:49 am
Giselle Minoli You have reached deep into my brain and painted the message more clearly than I could. Authenticity is easier when we feel “safer.” My first thought after that? What can we do to help the younger among us to feel safer, to take greater risks, to create something wonderful? To be authentic – I do wish someone had taught me that earlier in life.
April 2, 2012 at 2:54 am
Sally gave me permission to take a short break from writing, before we start a movie, to jump back into another thought journey fabulously emceed by Giselle Minoli. BTW, Giselle, no apology needed; you brought in Gary Stockton!
Thank you linda colman. Balance between objectivity and subjectivity, and as Jack C Crawford brought up, certainty vs, uncertainty has always been a teeter totter for me.
Jack, Giselle delved into the questions I was thinking. My G+ time was running out and I did not want threadjack and run. What has been your inspiration to break the walls down? BTW, this is what my writing project is about. Siamak Manzarpour knows divergent thinking is my passion. We discussed the link he just shared a couple of months ago in another discussion after I posted that animation around an abridged talk by Ken Robinson. Take the time to watch and check some of his other talks.
Where vulnerabilities and fears come from is debatable. Late in life experiences can change a confident, borderline arrogant sales and marketing executive like I was into an introspective, more vulnerable, self-deprecating guy. My confidence is not gone, but as Sally says, I’m more approachable.
Hey Sia, our kids got the “daddy versions” of their favorite books. The laughed tears from my “Unhappy Hollisters” and the “Good News Bears” and very open education. There are still fears and concerns. Some people face their’s others deny and hide from them, but they are there.
I agree with Brené’s “numbing ourselves.” We all do things that make us feel better. Some people eat, others drink or do drugs. We have deep, wild conversations about a myriad of topics. We’re people, thought, and conversation junkies who come to G+ for a fix. Doing something to feel good has an anesthetic effect on the stuff that makes us feel bad. Dopamine for everyone!
April 2, 2012 at 3:23 am
Sally is totally totally awesome. I have to meet her in person.
April 2, 2012 at 3:25 am
We must have our HIRL get together.
April 2, 2012 at 3:28 am
That’s sad Sia, but we wouldn’t do that.
April 2, 2012 at 3:32 am
Siamak Manzarpour I insist that you bring the Mignon to our first HIRL
April 2, 2012 at 6:39 am
Gary Stockton Thank you for this perfect example of how social media is transforming (for the better) much of what we considered sacrosanct prior to it.
April 2, 2012 at 6:54 am
Hello everyone
April 2, 2012 at 11:56 am
Hi pio dal cin. Siamak Manzarpour I absolutely think that avoidance is the same thing as numbing. The semantics – the word – that either you or Brene Brown or I or Gary S Hart would use to describe the state of distancing ourselves from ourselves, whatever you want to call it…avoidance or numbing…it’s the same thing.
The complaint, the sorrow, the issue I hear most often expressed by people, no matter their age, in life is that there is/was something they wanted to do with their lives that they got no support or encouragement from their families or loved ones to do: this person wanted to be an actor and was told by their father it would be a hard road, instead of to “go for it;” this person wanted to be a musician and their family told them they “were no Mozart;” this person wanted to be a painter and were told by a teacher “your drawings are good for the refrigerator, but not a gallery wall,” this person wanted to be a writer, but their family pressured them with “we breed doctors in this family, not writers.”
We are very specific in what is culturally acceptable, what is “safe,” what we “should” be doing with our lives. If we are born into families with parents who are themselves numb or avoiding or afraid or were unfortunately programmed by their own parents, there is little hope of raising a child with a sense of freedom and exploration about life.
There is a huge difference between a young person wanting to be a painter, fully exploring that possibility and then deciding for themselves that they don’t want to do it, and their family disrespecting their goals and creating fear and doubt such that they never give it a try in the first place, thereby drinking, smoking or taking solace in banana nut muffins and beer out of frustration and self-doubt.
What makes Brene Brown extraordinary is not her talk. It’s that, as a mother, a wife, a friend, a person, a therapist, she was willing to look at her own fears, go back into the room to stare them down and then, on top of all of that, share what she learned about herself with others. That is the parent to strive to be. The honest and open one.
April 2, 2012 at 2:25 pm
Siamak Manzarpour seriously, with all due respect, Vincent van Gogh made 900 paintings in his lifetime and only one sold. Few thought he had any talent at all and he is considered one of the greatest painters that ever lived. The same story is true of Monet and countless others. It was said of Frank Sinatra, in Hollywood, that he “couldn’t dance, but sings a little.” Most people, when it comes to the arts, do one of two things: destroy their children’s talent or push them into something they don’t want to do.
Only you could read into my words that I believe all children have talent. All I was saying is that parents should be careful not to determine their children’s future for them. Really, C’Ya…go back and read my words… You might have forgotten that I wasn’t born under a rock. I actually had parents too and my “opinion” comes from having been on Planet Earth for more than the time it takes to cook a three-minute egg. The world is filled with people who are not doing what they want to do with their lives. Were this not the case, perhaps we would not have so many people who are acting out their hostilities and unlived lives on other people. You cannot protect your children from everything. You can, however, encourage them to be authentic, whether it makes you comfortable or not. Perhaps Brene Brown’s talk didn’t “talk” to you? 🙂
April 2, 2012 at 2:36 pm
Gattaca Ethan Hawke. Rent it. Watch it.
April 2, 2012 at 2:42 pm
Parents have been testing their children for athletic abilities (all those fathers wanting their sons to play professional sports) and intellectual and business abilities (all those Moms and Dads wanting their kids to grow up to be doctors and lawyers and business wunderkinds) for decades. It is perhaps far easier to “test” a kid’s math skills or verbal skills. Most parents do not push their kids into the arts because they think they’ll starve to death. But my post isn’t about that. It’s about Brene Brown’s road from vulnerability to authenticity to the true self. And what is the true authentic “self” for the child, might not be the same true authentic self for the parent and vice versa.
April 2, 2012 at 2:45 pm
We can agree to disagree on this issue Siamak Manzarpour and that is okay with me.
April 2, 2012 at 3:02 pm
There is no where that I wrote I condone DNA testing of 3-4 year olds….C’Ya. You are reading into my words and it is mystifying how you’re doing that.
April 2, 2012 at 3:14 pm
Just my thought on this. Parents can be cruel to their children. They shouldn’t, but they are. This treatment can be passive or active, but the child is deeply hurt nevertheless. Sia, your advice leaves out a broad class of people that would not, could not, follow it.
Giselle advice addresses the hurt a child experiences when the parent disregards who their child really is.
April 2, 2012 at 3:29 pm
I was fortunate to have parents who encouraged me to pursue my passions, whatever they may be, and accept it when I didn’t gravitate toward the things they would like to see me excel at. Golf for example. When I was a kid, my Dad used to rent my brother and I out to caddy for his mates at Farnham golf club every weekend, even the rainy ones. Each weekend tournament involved 36 holes, 18 in the morning and 18 after lunch, and a hang around in the bar for the prize giving. I think this soured my love of the sport over time, and while I developed a classic golf swing, I didn’t have the passion for it. The one thing I cherish however, are the memories of the golf course. Knowing how little things change in England, I am confident those fairways look the same today.
When I was around 8, my parents got me a guitar and the rest was history. I was able to write a song for my father and present it to him on his 70th birthday, wrote about his days up in Bermondsey peddling antiques to get us to America. That made him proud, and today we can watch the golf when he comes around to visit. If I had children, I would do it much the same way.
April 2, 2012 at 4:55 pm
I’m learning (still). As we have all discussed, economic realities shoot cannonball shots at our dreams. In India, where Firoze Shakir so poignantly captures the pain of economic hardship, there isn’t a lot of realization of dreams. Even though, I believe that we are. Our situations don’t define us. So I have career, home, family, etc that I don’t feel supported in, doesn’t line up with my dreams, causes me suffering, etc. Focusing on that doesn’t fix it. Let’s allow others to intervene where they can. Encourage parents (when they can) to set their individual children free to go out there and “go for it” (as Giselle Minoli encourages us daily). Are we losing something by freeing them? Yes, we are losing our ego. That’s it, plain and simple. Even worrying for our children’s safety is ultimately dysfunctional, in my opinion. We can offer help, that’s human kindness. But, we must accept and love them no matter what course they pursue.
(by the way, I’m not talking about failing to fulfill parental responsibilities – no child negligence please, leaving your kid (or animal) in a hot car for example).
April 2, 2012 at 4:55 pm
That’s about all I can post for today … gotta get some work done for my generous and patient employer. 🙂
April 2, 2012 at 5:16 pm
No Siam, there are many things in the world that are not conducive to dreams. The founders of the USA were up against millenniums of tyranny, but their fight for freedom changed the world. Fulfilling dreams require faith, hard work, determination, and persistence.
Jack, we raised our kids with what I called the lion method. Raise and equip them to live in the world; to think independently and chase their dreams with faith, hard work, determination, and persistence. And let them go, always there for them with loving support and encouragement, while I am still alive.
April 2, 2012 at 7:00 pm
via Christopher Lynn https://plus.google.com/106273142422645495807/posts/fUDhRXjePVg?hl=en
April 2, 2012 at 8:39 pm
Giselle Minoli Jack C Crawford Siamak Manzarpour Interesting thread:)
April 2, 2012 at 11:33 pm
Good afternoon (and evening, morning, etc for those outside of the Americas).
Where is everybody?
This topic was getting fun. And I miss you guys.
April 2, 2012 at 11:46 pm
Hmmm….coming back to this thread after work, to which I must return for another hour or so tonight and I just wanted to add that I think parents’ paranoia about whether or not their children are going to survive or how the are going to survive causes a lot of problems. Looking back, critically, on my own life, the most important guidance that I could have used would have been to see through to the end everything I began and then to ask myself what it meant to me and what I got out of it. It took me quite a while to separate out emotional needs from intellectual needs from creative needs from financial needs. Society and culture press us to make the financial needs rise to the top of the heap at the get-go. But if we’re not clear on what drives us, if we’re not clear about who we are in our cores, it is very, very easy for the train to get off the track. Brene Brown alludes to this when she talks about her own re-evaluation of self. This is something only very strong people do by the time they’ve become adults. It’s hard. But it’s necessary, particularly if you don’t want to mess up your children.
April 2, 2012 at 11:51 pm
Amendment: Strangely and interestingly most of the people that I known in my life who have ventured off in some direction that would appear to be fraught with financial peril, who have ventured off to find themselves have turned out just fine indeed. They are better bosses, better employees and quite solid people. The people on the other hand that have not done that when they might have wanted to, tend to be unfulfilled and have a more difficult time with the choices they’ve made in their lives.
April 2, 2012 at 11:54 pm
Ten shares and 73 comments. And the comments are intelligent and substantial. Wow.
This is a keeper. So, I shall now repaste a few of Sia’s comments. They won’t be indexed to him, so he should be OK with it. However, if it is unbearable, let me know. I’ll take the Mignon in trade.
April 2, 2012 at 11:55 pm
Siamak Manzarpour quoted: I have just finished listening to the talk by Ms. Brown and have more or less scanned through all the comments here.
Here is my 2 cents worth of contribution on the subject;
Ms. Brown is in fact exploring one of the oldest matters of philosophical contemplation, psychological vulnerabilities .
Barring the analogy of taking fat from the butt and applying it to our cheeks ( is there a messianic inference here?) which I view as being more Gissel’s own own take than actuality, I suppose what she talks about can be reduced into a much simpler understanding as follows;
It is not the external impulses that make us vulnerable but rather how we “react” to them that creates vulnerabilities
Take a child who has been raised in a family who places great emphasis on social stigmas for example. A lazy father, a mother who drinks too much or a gay brother , a biker uncle ,…… may all be classified as social ills in this child’s brain as he/she grows into an adult.
On the one hand the child has been programmed to recognize these external impulses as red lines which should be avoided at all cost, but on the other no programming has been performed in the way of reacting to these external inputs when the child enters adulthood.
In short this child’s psychology has been constructed with vulnerabilities already built in as integral components of his or her psychological construct.
I also disagree with Ms. Brown in that we tend to numb ourselves, because we don’t, we simply avoid…we avoid crossing bridges by taking the long road to bypass our vulnerabilities…In short we waste our lives in avoidance .
In conclusion I can only add that vulnerabilities start at a very early age and by over parenting parents who are directly responsible for constructing long term vulnerabilities in their own children.
Yesterday 9:29 PM
April 2, 2012 at 11:55 pm
Siamak Manzarpour quoted: +Giselle Minoli I did not mean to infer that you did. My apology for the way my last comment came out.
+Jack C Crawford the notion that children are born with hidden personalities is in itself mystifying in that even though certain DNA coding may get passed along to children, it is ultimately these predispositions along with environmental inputs that evolve into adulthood.
I am not a child psychologist or a professional in this field other than parental qualifications I accumulated throughout 30 years of raising our kids.
I was fortunate enough to experience an immense level of gifted talent in our first child. His artistic talents started to show at kindergarten when his sketches would take his teachers by surprise.
By the time he was at high school, he was already legendary to the extent that his huge mural paintings on the walls of his high school still stand undisturbed even after 12 years since he moved on to university.
Seeing that his excellence in the sciences were equally as exemplary as his artistic aptitude, we encouraged him (coerced and forced him?? ) to sit for an architectural entrance exam.So He did.
He not only got accepted with full scholarship, but his test results also came among the top 10 of the 50 acceptances. Total candidates competing for 50 places was in excess of 3000 that year.
He achieved all this while battling cancer and ensuing chemotherapy treatments starting at the age of 12.
So he started at university having won a prestigious scholarship in architecture……… But we soon found out he was miserable.
He hated Architecture but had never had the courage to voice it to us.
His passion was computers and he switched courses after the first year.
I have laid out the story because I don’t believe that what kids are naturally gifted with is what they will ultimately choose as a way of life….This to me is exactly what parents fail to acknowledge.
It is as if it’s already a given that everyone should follow their passion and talents as a way of life. This to me (based on my own experiences) is in itself a false notion and needs to be addressed with sincerity.
9:52 AM
April 2, 2012 at 11:56 pm
Siamak Manzarpour quoted: I have just come back home after a day of dealing with work, aka my economic vulnerabilities 🙂
While idling in city’s nightmarish traffic it dawned on me that I actually recognized my fellow traffic dwellers.
You see if you happen to hit the rush hour at exactly the same time on a regular basis, chances are that you would get to recognize other drivers who do the same…Isn’t that something?
The lady who constantly talks to herself, the man with a funny mustache, the young woman who puts her make up on behind the wheel, even though she must be going home, the young man who must have spent four times the value of his car on his cool set of rims and tires.:-)
I didn’t know that until today…..I felt so vulnerable upon that realization < kidding >, but I suppose what I want to drive at is that the term vulnerabilities within the context of this discussion sounds more like a byproduct of affluence and economic realities.
Half way across the world in Afghanistan where people are truly vulnerable I doubt if this discussion would strike a cord with any one Afghani . I suppose because their conditioning is not conducive to personal reflection…food shelter and safety occupy 99.99% of the Afghan population I suppose.
Here is what I have taken out of this discussion and seeing that I do not leave public comments (unless they are purely sterile), I would like to state the following before my comments self destruct in the order that they appeared;
1-Adults with vulnerabilities can always see a shrink who would influence them to blame their parents for their vulnerabilities
This is the easy part.
2-If you bring children to this world you have a social responsibility to do your best to ensure they become productive members of the same society.
How you do that is your choice but I fail to see how letting them go off like butterflies and finding themselves is going to work for them or the society that they live in.
Children are born as children because of some pretty good reasons or nature would have produced them with fully developed brains and emotional content in one neat package. You would then not have to do anything. A perfect microwave meal with the trimmings right out of the freezer:-)
3-Ultimately parents are responsible for how their kids turn out in the venerability department.
If you are planning to have kids, talk to people who have raised kids before. You may find it ain’t your thing in which case you will have done the world a favor.
Thank you all for bearing with me.
4:38 PM
April 2, 2012 at 11:57 pm
The last three posts were a selection of Sia’s posts above. They need to be read in context with the other comments … so please consider that when reviewing them some day in the distant future.
April 3, 2012 at 12:01 am
This is not a dress rehearsal. It is the only life any of us will ever get. If we don’t explore it and ourselves fully it will be over before we know it. That is called fear.
April 3, 2012 at 12:06 am
Siamak Manzarpour I made sure not to mention your name in each post repaste. Giselle can delete them. I’m just saying this is an awesome post. By removing your metadata, it should be safe from linkage to your profile.
April 3, 2012 at 12:06 am
In fact, the bad guys will think I wrote them!
April 3, 2012 at 12:48 am
And as we artists say…it would be unwise to mess with the dust on the wings of a butterfly.
April 3, 2012 at 1:06 am
really true Giselle Minoli
April 3, 2012 at 1:22 am
There is a story that Amadeus Mozart’s father Leopold’s weakness was intolerance for music that ended on a dissonant note or chord. Young Amadeus would mischievously play a dissonant chord whenever he passed by a keyboard knowing his father would get up and play the note or chord of resolution. Life is a symphony filled with dissonance that waits for us to complete with resolution.
April 3, 2012 at 1:39 am
I love that story Gary S Hart. My what one learns on G+. I also loved the movie Amadeus. A great one I thought.