Good morning,Tweeting authors/writers,
This article about tweeting authors made me smile. Do you tweet?
Calling it Twitter was not an accident. If you have ever spent any time watching birds, you’ll notice how playful, fast, unpredictable, naughty…and sometimes downright mean they can be. And…there’s the group tweet and the solo tweet (witness the behavior of birds on a telephone wire!)
Many authors have little use for the pretension of hermetic distance and never accepted a historically specific idea of what it means to be a writer. With the digital age come new conceptions of authorship. And for both authors and readers, these changes may be unexpectedly salutary. At their best, social media democratize literature and demystify the writing process. When they use social media, authors have as many personae to choose from as they do in their other writings.
I agree with Anne Trubek’s (author of A Skeptic’s Guide to Writer’s Houses) premise that social media has removed the distance between writers/authors and their audiences and that the often crazy writer/author hermetically sealed away somewhere saying “I want to be alone!” is becoming a relic.
Actually, I confess publicly and somewhat nervously that this describes me. I love to be alone when I write because it’s the only way I can draw a line in the sand between writing for my company and writing for myself. And (this is no small thing) my hearing is so acute that I can hear a guy snoring down the street (ask my husband). I can hear the low battery warming on a carbon monoxide alarm in the townhouse a block away (ask my husband). Living in a New York City apartment, I can hear all sorts of things that one doesn’t really want to hear.
But I digress. How can you not like a writer such as Mat Johnson, who says about his readers: βThe people I follow, they are my dream party guests, interesting strangers whose wit keeps me coming back.β
What has really changed is that the old Hollywood system of grooming actors and controlling their imagine down to their plucked eyebrows, which existed in the old publishing world as well – beautiful photographs, make-up artists, wardrobe consultants, publicists and agents carefully monitoring everything one said, did and ate – that world is gone. And what has emerged in it’s place is a more playful, authentic, spontaneous and eruptive environment where anything goes.
To tweet, or not to tweet if you are a writer. That is the question.
Have a good day, everyone.
Giselle
January 10, 2012 at 2:39 pm
I heard Susan Orlean on NPR yesterday describe Twitter as an antidote to the isolation of writing. She described it as a walk around the “office.”
January 10, 2012 at 2:58 pm
Nice comments on a good essay.
I am also pro-tweet, and it’s not because of technology. I’m interested in maintaining direct communication with readers, and that’s what online networks facilitate.
I don’t find it distracting but rather part of my overall work.
January 10, 2012 at 3:27 pm
Giselle, you and I have talked about this. I also agree with Chris Guillebeau, great comments. I grasp it with the birds illustration. (Why does Hitchcock come to my mind?).
Anyway, for me Twitter is great for getting quotes, inspirational soundbites, breaking news, a feel of what irritates or impresses others, etc etc. The 140 limit is the reason G+ works for me. I usually only retweet on twitter.
Now this may shock some of you, but I also use it as a notepad and bookmarking tool.
January 10, 2012 at 4:27 pm
I started using Twitter recently, not expecting too much from it. But as I learned how to use it effectively I found that I can get news specific to my interests very quickly, then share it with my readers. That keeps them engaged and I look like an informed editor. π
January 10, 2012 at 8:43 pm
Twitter has opened the doors to a world of relationships in the sales community for me. I’m in a circle of some incredible authors and consultants. We share ideas, support, and promote each other.
The negative, which I am working on reversing, us punctuated, under-writing. This is a concern that has hindered my coaches use of Twitter, and what he is helping me recover from.
As Jack C Crawford said, it’s an excellent source for news, ideas, and inspirational tidbits. The opportunity to meet new people and take those relationships to the next level by phone, video chat, or in person is the golden nugget.
January 10, 2012 at 8:45 pm
Gary Hart I’ve also been adding people on twitter that I have found here on G+. The criteria is that they are engaging. If they have a twitter link in their profile, I go ahead and add it.
January 10, 2012 at 10:25 pm
Joe Lyons I love that…a walk around the office, which would be the watercooler. But…back to my “bird” analogy, more appropriately for Tweeters, it would be let’s go hang out around the birdbath!
January 10, 2012 at 10:27 pm
Most curious Chris Guillebeau Jack C Crawford Kristin Berkery and Gary Hart…how often do you Tweet and (come on now…fess up) do you Tweet more than participate on G+, or the other way around? Or is it just so different that this is a bird-brained questioned (sorry…couldn’t help it)?
January 11, 2012 at 12:05 am
Giselle Minoli I only tweet when I’m bored. (actually, not quite).
Google+ became a crippling addiction; hence, my infamous hiatus. Twitter was never addictive. With applying a moral judgement, Google+ wins as the one where I spend most of my time. BUT, it’s time very well spent. I keep twitter mostly to tweet links (from a website), retweets and the occasional small comment.
I also use a feature (3rd party service) that let’s me use three circles to rebroadcast a Google+ post. I have one for Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn.
The third party service is called http://plusbounce.com by Tim Pope https://plus.google.com/109749101189546280011/posts/SkcrE9K7P6E
January 11, 2012 at 1:19 am
During 2010, I spent about an hour per day on Twitter and In 2011, I spent a little more. Now I spend less than half an hour. FB remains steady at less than 30 minutes. Tweetdeck has been helpful with scheduling as is another service I share with a group of sales and marketing writers.
My engagement level on social media in general has waned since Thanksgiving. Google+ is a game changer for me. I am a 1st gen G-plusser. I love and prefer the conversation here. Most of my SM attention is devoted to G+ even though it does not have the marketing impact of Twitter. Jack C Crawford, I’m going to look at plusbounce.com; thanks!
January 11, 2012 at 3:35 am
Gary Hart what you and Jack C Crawford (and I think Kristin Berkery and Chris Guillebeau ) are saying is that you are using Twitter more for business/marketing and G+ more for another kind of communication (“the criteria is that they are engaging”). I get that. For me Joe Lyons G+ is my antidote from the isolation of writing. We are each of us different in our needs. Thanks all…
January 13, 2012 at 3:03 am
I started it up, then let it set for months, then got sucked in…It could be considered OCD-ish to leave up the window so if a new @ shows up I can check it out π I use it for both socializing with folks I wouldn’t normally get to interact with (across the globe) and as part of networking.
January 13, 2012 at 3:06 am
You are all made of more disciplined stuff than I am, I am afraid. Jack C Crawford bored? I don’t think so. Dee Solberg OCD? I don’t think so. Gary Hart a recovering underwriter? I don’t think so!
January 13, 2012 at 3:10 am
It isn’t even if I can’t hardly stand to turn off the computer because I might miss a post?